<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Did we Meet About?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ntschutta.com/jat/2006/04/02/what-did-we-meet-about/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ntschutta.com/jat/2006/04/02/what-did-we-meet-about/</link>
	<description>Just A Thought...on Ajax, usability, software development and anything else that catches my fancy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 15:57:49 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://ntschutta.com/jat/2006/04/02/what-did-we-meet-about/comment-page-1/#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 01:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ntschutta.com/jat/?p=107#comment-361</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments Jared!  I didn&#039;t really think about the email route (I&#039;ve written email off a bit due to the amount of &quot;noise&quot; that comes through my inbox) but that would help mitigate some of the &quot;that&#039;s not was I thought&quot; issues.  I&#039;m not saying that I would be afraid to use this approach but I suspect some of my coworkers would push back...of course it doesn&#039;t help that our meetings typically start late - which means they then run long leading to an entire day that is behind.  Anyway, thanks for taking the time to comment, I appreciate it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments Jared!  I didn&#8217;t really think about the email route (I&#8217;ve written email off a bit due to the amount of &#8220;noise&#8221; that comes through my inbox) but that would help mitigate some of the &#8220;that&#8217;s not was I thought&#8221; issues.  I&#8217;m not saying that I would be afraid to use this approach but I suspect some of my coworkers would push back&#8230;of course it doesn&#8217;t help that our meetings typically start late &#8211; which means they then run long leading to an entire day that is behind.  Anyway, thanks for taking the time to comment, I appreciate it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared Spool</title>
		<link>http://ntschutta.com/jat/2006/04/02/what-did-we-meet-about/comment-page-1/#comment-313</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared Spool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 00:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ntschutta.com/jat/?p=107#comment-313</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad you find the idea intriguing. The time it takes is a concern and, you&#039;re right, it could be valuable in the long run.

In its shortest form, it only takes a little more than a minute. You have people answer the three questions just as they leave the room. It doesn&#039;t give you a chance, at that moment, to discuss it, but that could happen later over email or someother medium.

I guess I&#039;m saying I wouldn&#039;t let the time investment scare you from the technique.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad you find the idea intriguing. The time it takes is a concern and, you&#8217;re right, it could be valuable in the long run.</p>
<p>In its shortest form, it only takes a little more than a minute. You have people answer the three questions just as they leave the room. It doesn&#8217;t give you a chance, at that moment, to discuss it, but that could happen later over email or someother medium.</p>
<p>I guess I&#8217;m saying I wouldn&#8217;t let the time investment scare you from the technique.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

