<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Users Lie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ntschutta.com/jat/2005/12/31/users-lie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ntschutta.com/jat/2005/12/31/users-lie/</link>
	<description>Just A Thought...on Ajax, usability, software development and anything else that catches my fancy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:15:35 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://ntschutta.com/jat/2005/12/31/users-lie/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 01:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ntschutta.com/jat/?p=63#comment-82</guid>
		<description>Thanks guys, I really appreciate the comments (sorry I didn&#039;t respond sooner - been a bit busy...)  John, I&#039;ve encountered EXACTLY what you&#039;re talking about - well, we want this.  Why?  &#039;Cause that&#039;s what the old system did.  It&#039;s just amazing to me that people don&#039;t grasp that rewrites allow you to reengineer the business process, a process that is all too often tailored around deficiencies in the systems!  In fact, the last &quot;real&quot; project I was on at my former employer was no more than a direct port to the web - we couldn&#039;t even modify the database to be, oh, I don&#039;t know, relational!

Jeff, great point about release 2.0.  Too often I&#039;ve seen projects derailed because users HAD to have all these features *right now!*  Like waiting a couple of months would be the end of the world...  Man, no updates in 2 years, what&#039;s the point?  Especially if there have been numerous complaints.  Ahh, you wouldn&#039;t want to listen to users on something like that - heck, they should just learn to do it right.

Well, you two have inspired to write another post - hopefully soon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks guys, I really appreciate the comments (sorry I didn&#8217;t respond sooner &#8211; been a bit busy&#8230;)  John, I&#8217;ve encountered EXACTLY what you&#8217;re talking about &#8211; well, we want this.  Why?  &#8216;Cause that&#8217;s what the old system did.  It&#8217;s just amazing to me that people don&#8217;t grasp that rewrites allow you to reengineer the business process, a process that is all too often tailored around deficiencies in the systems!  In fact, the last &#8220;real&#8221; project I was on at my former employer was no more than a direct port to the web &#8211; we couldn&#8217;t even modify the database to be, oh, I don&#8217;t know, relational!</p>
<p>Jeff, great point about release 2.0.  Too often I&#8217;ve seen projects derailed because users HAD to have all these features *right now!*  Like waiting a couple of months would be the end of the world&#8230;  Man, no updates in 2 years, what&#8217;s the point?  Especially if there have been numerous complaints.  Ahh, you wouldn&#8217;t want to listen to users on something like that &#8211; heck, they should just learn to do it right.</p>
<p>Well, you two have inspired to write another post &#8211; hopefully soon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jsteil</title>
		<link>http://ntschutta.com/jat/2005/12/31/users-lie/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>jsteil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 14:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ntschutta.com/jat/?p=63#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Another thing I don&#039;t get is why projects don&#039;t automatically plan for a second release after the initial goes in?  Not that we should plan for things to be wrong, but it is inevitable that once a system goes live and the users start using it for real they&#039;ll want to change some things to make their job easier.  I have seen too many times recently where we dump a system into production and it just sits there without any enhancements after that.  

We have an end-customer app that went to production 2 years that hasn&#039;t had a single update applied to it since even though our webmaster receives between 10-15 complaints about it per week.  If you attempt using it over dial-up, you might as well not even try.  Get an error in the middle of a multi-step process?  Too bad, you have to start over.  We&#039;ve tried to get momentum behind enhancing the app, but the standard reply we get is that there isn&#039;t any money in the budget to do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another thing I don&#8217;t get is why projects don&#8217;t automatically plan for a second release after the initial goes in?  Not that we should plan for things to be wrong, but it is inevitable that once a system goes live and the users start using it for real they&#8217;ll want to change some things to make their job easier.  I have seen too many times recently where we dump a system into production and it just sits there without any enhancements after that.  </p>
<p>We have an end-customer app that went to production 2 years that hasn&#8217;t had a single update applied to it since even though our webmaster receives between 10-15 complaints about it per week.  If you attempt using it over dial-up, you might as well not even try.  Get an error in the middle of a multi-step process?  Too bad, you have to start over.  We&#8217;ve tried to get momentum behind enhancing the app, but the standard reply we get is that there isn&#8217;t any money in the budget to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gear Daddie</title>
		<link>http://ntschutta.com/jat/2005/12/31/users-lie/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Gear Daddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 04:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ntschutta.com/jat/?p=63#comment-79</guid>
		<description>Excellent Post!  Sometimes users like other times they are too grounded in their day-to-day work that they don&#039;t have any idea what _can_ be done.  I&#039;ve recently worked on a system that was a web app port of a &quot;green screen&quot; application.  Developers (note - there were no real designers as is very typical) did exactly what the users said they wanted and guess what the got:  A complete copy of their green screen app with prettier fonts.  What a waste...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent Post!  Sometimes users like other times they are too grounded in their day-to-day work that they don&#8217;t have any idea what _can_ be done.  I&#8217;ve recently worked on a system that was a web app port of a &#8220;green screen&#8221; application.  Developers (note &#8211; there were no real designers as is very typical) did exactly what the users said they wanted and guess what the got:  A complete copy of their green screen app with prettier fonts.  What a waste&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

